At the time we first read
the piece, I was put off by it because I felt that it seemed to discount the
experiences of many people—hikers, hunters, gardeners, farmers, aviators, artists,
etc. —that do read the landscape but don’t necessarily write about it.
Now I regard it in a
different way, because the concept of reading the landscape is useful even if
Mr. Lewis seems determined to make a hard distinction between himself and those he
feels he has not yet taught how to see.
Looking to the landscape
to give us information about human culture, migration of ideas, history,
technology, conflict, class, and many, many subtle detailed things within these
broad categories is great. I don’t know that I will carry phrases like “the
axiom of landscape obscurity” around with me, but I am interested in
translating the idea of reading the landscape to the interior environment, where the essential idea of careful observation seems like a cornerstone of
good design practice.
Looking at existing
interior spaces—renovations, historic buildings, demolished structures, FIT,
anything—there are many, many things to “read”. The buildings are like stories you
walk through. The materials tell things about the environment. The fixtures tell things about history or culture. The arrangement of spaces tells things about technology and economics. Doing a survey can be much, much more than measuring and the designer can spend time
reading the spaces, asking questions of them, and following up with further research.
No comments:
Post a Comment